Most popular ▴ See a list of all my posts! The experts got it wrong. Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Gender bias calculator The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Innovation on buses. Heathrow

PDFs and Data ▾ Global open data and PDFs. Improving PDFs for Science. Improving PDFs for Planners. PDFAttacher. A Clearer Plan Hybrid PDFs PDF test-off. PDF Profiler Making PDFs play nicely with data

Housing ▾ Counting households. 1. Counting households. 2. The housing market works (where we let it) Hexmaps Adonis is wrong on housing Car free Birmingham

Regional Growth ▾ Measuring tech in the UK and France in 10 steps. Defending the Zombie graph. Channel 4 must move to Mancheseter Measuring innovation 1: meetups Measuring innovation 2: scientific papers. The UK city-size abnormality. Cities not cheese: why France is productive. How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Industrial Strategy. Leeds Growth Strategy 5: Limits. Leeds Growth Strategy 4: Focus. Leeds Growth Strategy 3: Inclusive growth. Leeds Growth Strategy 2: Where to grow? Leeds Growth Strategy 1: Why grow? Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Inclusive growth. The BBC in Manchester 1 The BBC in Manchester 2 What works (growth) North-South divide: we never tried Imitating Manchester Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Researching research Replacing UK steel The Economist & The North The State of the North, 2015 Move the Lords! Calderdale Digital Strategy Maths of inequality Income by MSOA Heathrow and localism The NorthernPowerhouse Centralism and Santa Claus Yorkshire backwards London makes us poor

Transport ▾ Crossrail 2: Where trust in experts dies. Pacers: crap trains, worth keeping. A Yorkshire transport policy. Stop telling me to learn from London. Fixing it ourselves: bus data in the North. Open fare data will be hard. Transport is too complex! Investment is political London loses when it blocks Leeds' growth The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map What works (growth) The Value of Time Innovation on buses. Heathrow 1975 WYMetro Plan

Politics & Economics ▾ GDP measures are like toilets. The UK's private postcodes restrict innovation. Yorkshire could learn from Ireland's success. Alternatives to GDP are a waste of time. Fiscal balance in the UK "Not like London" Innovation takes time to measure Fifa and the right In defence of the € GDP mystery Liberal protectionists 5 types of EU voter Asylum responsibilities STEM vs STEAM The Economist & Scotland BBC Bias? Northern rail consultation What holds us back? Saving the Union Summing it up

Positive ▾ Bike Lights Playful Everywhere Greggs vs. Pret Guardian comment generator Consult less, do more! More things for Leeds! Cartoons PubQuest: Birmingham

Tech ▾ What's holding back opendata in the UK? Anti-trust law saved computing 1 Anti-trust law saved computing 2 Open Data Camp Cardiff Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? Tap to pay. Open Data in Birmingham Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map Building a TechNation How the UK holds back TechNorth GDS is Windows 8 OpenData at the BBC SimFlood SimSponge See me speak Digital Health Leeds Empties Leeds Site Allocations Building a Chrome extension I hate webkit Visualising mental health Microsoft's 5 easy wins Epson px700w reset Stay inside the Bubble

Old/incomplete ▾ Orange price rises The future of University Cherish our Capital Dealing with NIMBYs Sponsoring the tube Gender bias calculator MetNetMaker Malaria PhD Symbian Loops Zwack Kegg Project The EU Eduroam & Windows 8 Where is science vital? The Vomcano 10 things London can shove Holbeck Waterwheel

Last modified: 19 February 2016

Windows 8 and GDS; difficult steps in a brilliant direction.

Quick not perfect. Two hours or it won’t get done at all. Comments welcome unless it’s a flame war about Windows vs. Mac because I really don’t care.

I was really happy yesterday to see Ben Holliday tweet his experience with a Windows 8 laptop. He’d stepped into my territory, he wasn’t impressed, and I think his criticisms were largely correct.

What interested me most were the parallels between Ben’s criticisms of Windows 8 and user criticism of the work that’s being done to transform the UK government’s digital services. So in this blog post I’m going to explain why the current state of the UK’s transformed government digital services has all the flaws of Windows 8. I’ll also explain why it should keep going and if possible learn from the fixes that Microsoft has made to create Windows 10.

I’ll use two examples; changing the background in Windows, and settling a PAYE bill with HMRC.


Changing the background in Windows 10

The driver for change in Windows 8 was touch. The old system from Windows 7 (retained in Windows 10, below) is complete and familiar but it is too detailed to be used by touch and not scalable to different screen sizes.

In Windows 10 this process has been enormously improved. A step has been removed between being presented with the control panel (now called settings) and being able to change background.

The user interface is now adapative, from a panel layout on a light background in step 1 on desktop (above) to a list layout on a dark background in step 1 on mobile (below). Icons, descriptions, and buttons are all simplified for touch without removing or hiding any features.

This transition was not at all easy. In Windows 8 changing desktop background was so difficult that YouTube videos explained how to do it. The task required switching between both the traditional view and the modern view and hugely increased the complexity of what should have been simple.

But that step in the middle was necessary. There was no way to jump from Windows 7 to Windows 10. Similarly there's no way to jump from the digital services that the UK's central government is replacing to those that it will have in 3 years time. At the moment we are stuck in the middle.


Settling a PAYE bill with HMRC using

Now let’s look at the current state of’s site for HMRC, examining something I do every month – pay the PAYE tax bill for my employee.

Straight away we encounter the Windows 8 problem. The legacy business tax dashboard is best accessed via a new site meaning that my introduction to the site is a complete change in UI.

But once I’m in, the legacy setup works well. I log in, see the tax I owe, click on it to see a breakdown by payment period, and then click again to be taken to a payment service. I receive familiar visual reminders of the three key details I need to remember; the amount due, the payment period, and my PAYE employer reference.

Well, I say it works well, but in fact it doesn’t work on mobile at all. It’s complete and familiar to me, but it’s daunting to a new user. It has all the problems of Windows 7.

The answer is a new business tax dashboard, which is currently at the Windows 8 phase of development. The UI is well-designed for touch and for different device sizes but over-simplification makes it almost useless. Instead of reminding me of my essential PAYE employers reference I’m reminded when I last signed in. Clicking on the amount of tax I owe does nothing, so I don’t know for which tax period the amount is due. Step 3 of the process is completely missing; unimplemented or hidden within the new service.

Things get worse when I want to pay. Lots of screens, demands for information that has never been presented to me, and reference to a letter that I received nearly 3 years ago. Things have improved since the payment service marked itself as Beta (I do not want to pay my taxes via a Beta service) but it’s still a poor experience.

So there we have it, a rapid look at the similarities between Windows 8 and government digital services. It's clear to me that GDS are on the right path, and encountering many of the same problems that Microsoft did with Windows 8. I'm a bit worried that GDS might all be using Macs and so unaware that most of their problems have already been solved elsewhere. I'm even more worried that their smugness about "user-centred design" might be stopping them from learning from Microsoft's experience.


Adapt or die

Six years ago Microsoft had a choice with Windows. Stick with Windows 7 and keep making small changes, or go through six years of pain via Windows 8 to build Windows 10. They took the hard choice. I think they were right. Google’s decision to add touch to Chrome OS and prepare it for use on tablets confirms that.

GDS are about three years behind Microsoft. Today they’re at the Windows 8 stage of transforming government. They’re moving from a legacy system that just works to a new system with growing pains that can deliver for new users and new use-cases well into the future.

At the moment it isn’t pretty, but it’s better than the alternative. That alternative was to sit back, listen to current power-users, and keep them happy. Or, returning to the computer example, the alternative was Mac OS X — an operating system that has no prospect of supporting touch or the new users and the new use-cases that we are already seeing.


I hope Ben and more people in government digital design get a chance to try Windows 10 soon. I think they’ll really love the insider preview system that updates machines with new builds almost every week based on instant user-feedback. I think they’ll understand even more why GDS and Digital DWP are going in the right direction.

blog comments powered by Disqus