Most popular ⏷ See a list of all my posts! Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Gender bias calculator The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Innovation on buses. Heathrow

Housing ⏷ Counting households. 1. Counting households. 2. The housing market works (where we let it) Hexmaps Adonis is wrong on housing Car free Birmingham

Regional Growth ⏷ Measuring tech in the UK and France in 10 steps. Channel 4 must move to Mancheseter Measuring innovation 1: meetups Measuring innovation 2: scientific papers. The UK city-size abnormality. Cities not cheese: why France is productive. How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Industrial Strategy. Leeds Growth Strategy 1. Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Inclusive growth. The BBC in Manchester 1 The BBC in Manchester 2 What works (growth) North-South divide: we never tried Imitating Manchester Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Researching research Replacing UK steel The Economist & The North The State of the North, 2015 Move the Lords! Calderdale Digital Strategy Maths of inequality Income by MSOA Heathrow and localism The NorthernPowerhouse Centralism and Santa Claus Yorkshire backwards London makes us poor

Transport ⏷ Fixing it ourselves: bus data in the North. Open fare data will be hard. Transport is too complex! Investment is political London loses when it blocks Leeds' growth The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map What works (growth) The Value of Time Innovation on buses. Heathrow 1975 WYMetro Plan

Politics & Economics ⏷ The UK's private postcodes restrict innovation. Yorkshire could learn from Ireland's success. Alternatives to GDP are a waste of time. Fiscal balance in the UK "Not like London" Innovation takes time to measure Fifa and the right In defence of the € GDP mystery Liberal protectionists 5 types of EU voter Asylum responsibilities STEM vs STEAM The Economist & Scotland BBC Bias? Northern rail consultation What holds us back? Saving the Union Summing it up

Positive ⏷ Bike Lights Playful Everywhere Greggs vs. Pret Guardian comment generator Consult less, do more! More things for Leeds! Cartoons PubQuest: Birmingham

Tech ⏷ Anti-trust law saved computing 1 Anti-trust law saved computing 2 Open Data Camp Cardiff Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? Tap to pay. Open Data in Birmingham Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map Building a TechNation How the UK holds back TechNorth GDS is Windows 8 OpenData at the BBC SimFlood SimSponge See me speak Digital Health Leeds Empties Leeds Site Allocations Building a Chrome extension I hate webkit Visualising mental health Microsoft's 5 easy wins Epson px700w reset Stay inside the Bubble

Old/incomplete ⏷ Orange price rises The future of University Cherish our Capital Dealing with NIMBYs Sponsoring the tube Gender bias calculator MetNetMaker Malaria PhD Symbian Loops Zwack Kegg Project The EU Eduroam & Windows 8 Where is science vital? The Vomcano 10 things London can shove Holbeck Waterwheel

Last modified: 31 December 2015

SimFlood: from open data to open models

 

The first open data hack event I ever attended was in Leeds in March 2014, run by Leeds Data Mill. It was just a few months after widespread flooding in Somerset and The Environment Agency sent some of their top people. They helped us sign up for access to their opendata portal and took notes on what we liked and what we didn’t.

I learned a lot from Simon and Harriet that weekend. I learned how to work with shapefiles so that we could draw flood risk areas on a map. I learned new ways to geo-locate properties so that we could plot every planning permission in Leeds on the same map. Together we learned that in West Yorkshire councils almost never grant planning permission on flood plains.

Twenty months later, flooding hit Leeds. I was at my Dad’s in Wharfedale for Christmas and for a while completely cut off from the rest of Yorkshire. The media focused on the worst-affected areas of Leeds and our offices weren’t among them. Yet I could monitor the flooding in real-time thanks to fantastic open innovations by Jeni Tennison, Shoothill, and many more. I didn’t need to travel to save my equipment because I could tell that only our basement would be flooded.

In the next twenty months we’ll see even bigger advances in our power to monitor flooding. Cheap river level sensors that run for years on a single charge are being developed by flood network in Oxford. The UK’s first free and open LoRaWAN network to allow them to deliver readings in real-time has been deployed by Things Manchester.

We’ll soon have open Lidar data for the whole of the UK so that we can understand the catchment area of every river. In the coming year, we’ll see tools that make that data accessible to everyone.

 

So what next?

In early 2016 I’ll be working at ODILeeds and with others to organise a FloodHack in the North of England. We’ll discuss what we should do next and then do it. You will all be invited.

Until then here’s something to get you thinking.

Two years ago the environment agency knew a lot about flooding. The public knew very little. Today the public has access to a huge amount of data and great tools to understand it.

Today government agencies have a good understanding of what affects flooding. We can’t stop the rain but we can do a lot to defend ourselves from floods or design our environment so that flooding is reduced. The problem is that the models we need to answer questions like “how many properties in Hebden Bridge were flooded as a result of burning moorland?” aren’t open. Communities can achieve something with protests but they will achieve more if they can offer, and price, alternatives.

When it comes to open models, we’re where we were with open data two years ago. If we want to make a truly democratic decision on how we manage our rivers, how we use our land, and where we invest our money in flood defences we need to fix that. We need to understand the impact of our choices, let people play with different choices, and then build data-led arguments based on that process.

In 2016 I’ll be building SimFlood. I’ll be building the tool that George Monbiot can use to quantify the cost of burning moorland and straightening rivers. It will be scientifically rigorous but as easy to understand as a video game. I’m already looking for people to help build it, shape it, and support it.

Can you?

blog comments powered by Disqus