Most popular ▴ See a list of all my posts! Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Gender bias calculator The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Innovation on buses. Heathrow

PDFs and Data ▾ Improving PDFs for Science. Improving PDFs for Planners. PDFAttacher. A Clearer Plan Hybrid PDFs PDF test-off. PDF Profiler Making PDFs play nicely with data

Housing ▾ Counting households. 1. Counting households. 2. The housing market works (where we let it) Hexmaps Adonis is wrong on housing Car free Birmingham

Regional Growth ▾ Measuring tech in the UK and France in 10 steps. Defending the Zombie graph. Channel 4 must move to Mancheseter Measuring innovation 1: meetups Measuring innovation 2: scientific papers. The UK city-size abnormality. Cities not cheese: why France is productive. How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Industrial Strategy. Leeds Growth Strategy 5: Limits. Leeds Growth Strategy 4: Focus. Leeds Growth Strategy 3: Inclusive growth. Leeds Growth Strategy 2: Where to grow? Leeds Growth Strategy 1: Why grow? Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Inclusive growth. The BBC in Manchester 1 The BBC in Manchester 2 What works (growth) North-South divide: we never tried Imitating Manchester Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Researching research Replacing UK steel The Economist & The North The State of the North, 2015 Move the Lords! Calderdale Digital Strategy Maths of inequality Income by MSOA Heathrow and localism The NorthernPowerhouse Centralism and Santa Claus Yorkshire backwards London makes us poor

Transport ▾ Fixing it ourselves: bus data in the North. Open fare data will be hard. Transport is too complex! Investment is political London loses when it blocks Leeds' growth The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map What works (growth) The Value of Time Innovation on buses. Heathrow 1975 WYMetro Plan

Politics & Economics ▾ GDP measures are like toilets. The UK's private postcodes restrict innovation. Yorkshire could learn from Ireland's success. Alternatives to GDP are a waste of time. Fiscal balance in the UK "Not like London" Innovation takes time to measure Fifa and the right In defence of the € GDP mystery Liberal protectionists 5 types of EU voter Asylum responsibilities STEM vs STEAM The Economist & Scotland BBC Bias? Northern rail consultation What holds us back? Saving the Union Summing it up

Positive ▾ Bike Lights Playful Everywhere Greggs vs. Pret Guardian comment generator Consult less, do more! More things for Leeds! Cartoons PubQuest: Birmingham

Tech ▾ What's holding back opendata in the UK? Anti-trust law saved computing 1 Anti-trust law saved computing 2 Open Data Camp Cardiff Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? Tap to pay. Open Data in Birmingham Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map Building a TechNation How the UK holds back TechNorth GDS is Windows 8 OpenData at the BBC SimFlood SimSponge See me speak Digital Health Leeds Empties Leeds Site Allocations Building a Chrome extension I hate webkit Visualising mental health Microsoft's 5 easy wins Epson px700w reset Stay inside the Bubble

Old/incomplete ▾ Orange price rises The future of University Cherish our Capital Dealing with NIMBYs Sponsoring the tube Gender bias calculator MetNetMaker Malaria PhD Symbian Loops Zwack Kegg Project The EU Eduroam & Windows 8 Where is science vital? The Vomcano 10 things London can shove Holbeck Waterwheel

Last modified: 14 April 2017

The most important graph in British economics

“Is there a relationship between city size and productivity?” asked Centre for Cities in February 2015.

What a question.

The blog takes two reports and hundreds of pages from the OECD and distils it down to the biggest topic in city economics today; does being bigger make you richer?

It’s a question that I’ve been asking myself without knowing since I was 19, when I moved to London and Paris to study. I’ve been asking myself the same questions consciously since I was 25 and I couldn’t find a job in science after finishing a PhD in Leeds.

And now, thanks to some more great work by Centre for Cities , I can get a lot closer to answering the question than the OECD did.

Building a country that works for everyone

I think that these questions are going to matter even more in the coming years because,

So what does the data say? Do agglomeration benefits exist? Are bigger cities richer?

France and Germany’s cities show agglomeration benefits

In France and Germany there’s a pretty clear answer, yes. The line of best fit slopes up with size. It is statistically significant. It’s the same in the USA.

Scandinavia and The Low Country’s cities show large agglomeration benefits

There aren’t enough cities in Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, and The Netherlands to do a proper regression. But their economies are similar enough, so I just lump their cities together.

There’s a very strong agglomeration benefit.

Spain and the UK’s cities show no agglomeration benefits at all

Spain and the UK are different. Size doesn’t matter. In fact in the UK the best fit line slopes down a bit, but not significantly so.

The most important graph in British economics

And now the most important graph. The one’s that’s frustrated me all my life. The one that I don’t accept that the UK has ever tried to fix. And the one that makes taking lessons from books written in America and applying them to UK cities risky. Remove London from the graph of UK cities, and the larger a city gets, the poorer it is. This doesn’t happen in France or even in Spain.

I think that we can fix this. The NorthernPowerhouse is the right strategy, Metro Mayors will help, moving things the way that we moved 10% of the BBC to Manchester will help, and investing in transport and science in big cities where businesses want to grow will help.

But my faith in all those things is based on a belief that we can make our country more German, French, American, and Dutch in terms of agglomeration benefits. I hope that I’m right.

 

Want the data and graphs? They're here in Excel (except France which broke).

blog comments powered by Disqus